Objective. The objective of this study was to develop and validate KKU-BiblioMerge V.1.0, a bibliometric tool designed to address the limitations of single-source data in bibliometric analysis by integrating data from multiple databases, specifically Scopus and Web of Science (WoS). Design/Methodology/Approach. The tool was developed using the R Shiny framework and incorporated key functions for data deduplication, field mapping, and integrity checks to ensure effective dataset merging. The performance of KKU-BiblioMerge was assessed by testing its ability to import, merge, and export bibliometric data, focusing on the efficiency and accuracy of consolidating records from Scopus and WoS. Findings. The KKU-BiblioMerge application effectively processed and integrated 686 initial documents, eliminating 24.49% duplicate records to produce a final dataset of 518 unique entries. The tool demonstrated strong data consistency and high accuracy in field mapping, offering reliable cross-platform integration of bibliometric data compared to tools such as VOSviewer and Biblioshiny. Originality/Value. KKU-BiblioMerge V.1.0 was a user-friendly, robust solution for multi-database bibliometric analysis. It enabled a more comprehensive and unbiased understanding of research landscapes. Its capability to integrate diverse datasets laid a foundation for advancing bibliometric software, broadening the scope and accuracy of analyses across scientific domains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chansanam et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: