Key result
Heart rate variability indices did not significantly predict overall Army Combat Fitness Test performance in 50 cadets, though the stress index showed predictive properties for the 2-mile run.
Why the study?
Heart rate variability predicts athletic performance, but its applicability for predicting Army Combat Fitness Test performance outcomes in cadets had not been evaluated.
Does heart rate variability (HRV) predict Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) performance outcomes in army cadets?
Cross-Sectional (n=50)
Does heart rate variability (HRV) predict Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) performance outcomes in army cadets?
Resting HRV is generally not a reliable predictor of overall ACFT performance in army cadets, though the stress index may predict 2-mile run outcomes.
HRV should not inform cadet fitness assessment; leaves open targeted validation of stress index for run performance.
BACKGROUND: The Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) is a performance assessment used by the U.S. Army to assess a cadet's strength, endurance, and agility with a series of six events to ensure that cadets are combat ready. Heart rate variability (HRV) is an instrument that measures cardiac autonomic modulation and has been incorporated to predict the performance of athletes in daily training and competition since acute bouts of exercise alter HRV variables. PURPOSE: To assess the applicability of using HRV to predict ACFT score performance outcomes in cadets. METHODS: Fifty army cadets (n = 36 male; n = 14 female; age = 20.60 ± 3.61 years; height = 173.34 ± 10.39 cm; body mass = 76.33 ± 14.68 kg; body fat percentage = 17.58 ± 5.26%) completed the ACFT and reported for HRV assessment. HRV assessment had the participant lay supine for 5 minutes, and traditional time and frequency domain variables were assessed. A Pearson's correlation and multiple linear regressions were run. RESULTS: HRV time and frequency domains were not significantly correlated in linear regression models except the stress index (SI) and the 2-mile run (2MR). The standing power throw and sprint drag carry were significantly correlated with traditional HRV variables. CONCLUSIONS: HRV was not a predictor of ACFT performance for individual events or overall ACFT. The SI presented predictive properties only for 2MR, with no other significant correlations between HRV variables with standing power throw and sprint drag carry. The SI ability to predict 2MR performance outcome via HRV is a promising tool to assess army cadet performance and recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Torres et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy army cadets (n=50). Heart rate variability (HRV) indices was evaluated on Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) score performance outcomes. Heart rate variability indices did not significantly predict overall Army Combat Fitness Test performance in 50 cadets, though the stress index showed predictive properties for the 2-mile run.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: