Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AbstractObjectives: To investigate the necessity of out-of-hours calls and patient satisfaction with out-of-hours care. To assess the distribution between emergency care at a primary care emergency clinic and a hospital emergency department.Methods: In a prospective population-based study, over five weeks, all out-of-hour calls were registered: home visits, telephone advice, visits at the primary care emergency clinic, referrals by the general practitioner (GP) and self-referrals to the hospital emergency department. The primary care clinic in this study functions as an out-of-hours emergency clinic for a community with 23,000 inhabitants. The centre is staffed by a nurse or assistant, with the GP on duty being on call. The hospital emergency department is located in a different part of the city. Distribution of all emergency calls across the settings, necessity of primary care calls as judged by the provider, satisfaction of the patients of out-of-hours primary care were investigated.Results: The incidence of all out-of-hours calls was 260/1000/year (n=576). The self-referral rate to the hospital was 13%; 4% were referred to the hospital by the GP, 1% attended the emergency department by ambulance, 2% were referred by other GPs, and 80% were treated in the primary care setting exclusively. Of the 485 primary care patients, 363 were interviewed (response 74%). Of the interviewed patients, 87% were (very) satisfied with the service, 84% with the GP, 97% with the nurse. The GP or nurse judged 33% of the visits as unnecessary though understandable and 12% were judged as totally unnecessary. There was no relation between necessity and satisfaction, nor was satisfaction related to not getting a home visit, nor to seeing a nurse instead of a doctor.Conclusions: A low threshold primary care emergency clinic can function adequately in the vicinity of a freeaccess hospital emergency department. It is well accepted by patients and GPs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duijn et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: