Key result
Among 10,266 NSTEMI patients in China, coronary angiography was performed in 45.6% and revascularization in 40.9%, which was associated with reduced in-hospital MACCE (overall rate 6.7%).
Why the study?
Few studies had investigated the use of an invasive strategy for patients with NSTEMI in China.
Does invasive management reduce in-hospital MACCE and length of stay in patients with NSTEMI?
Observational (n=10,266)
Yes
Does invasive management reduce in-hospital MACCE and length of stay in patients with NSTEMI?
Invasive management for NSTEMI is significantly underutilized in China, particularly in lower-tier hospitals and among high-risk patients, despite being associated with improved in-hospital outcomes.
Invasive management was associated with lower MACCE in NSTEMI but should not change practice; leaves open confirmation by randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the use of invasive strategy for patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in China. We aimed to describe the contemporary pattern of management, medically and invasively, in patients with NSTEMI across China. METHODS: Using data of China Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry, we analyzed the baseline characteristics, in-hospital medication, index coronary angiography (CAG) and revascularization by stratification of gender, age, and risk assessment. Primary outcomes included in-hospital major adverse cardio-cerebral events (MACCE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial (re)infarction, and stroke) and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: A total of 10,266 NSTEMI patients were enrolled between January 2013 and November 2016. Dual antiplatelet therapy and statins were prescribed in 92.9% and 92.1% of overall patients respectively. CAG was performed in 45.6% of these patients, and 40.9% had an index revascularization. Female, older or higher risk patients were less likely to receive CAG or revascularization. The rates of CAG were 67.9% in the provincial-level, 46.2% in the prefectural, and 12.1% in the county-level hospitals. Of those patients undergoing revascularization, 77.0% (1,156/1,501) very-high-risk patients received urgent revascularization and 16.2% (440/2,699) high-risk patients underwent early revascularization as recommended. The overall in-hospital MACCE was 6.7%, and the median LOS was 10 (6) days. Revascularization was associated with reduction for in-hospital MACCE regardless of risk and age. CONCLUSION: Invasive management was underused and profoundly deferred among patients with NSTEMI in China. The risk-treatment paradox, procedure deferral and medical resources distribution imbalance may represent opportunities for improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leng et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (n=10,266). Invasive management (coronary angiography and revascularization) vs. Medical management was evaluated on In-hospital major adverse cardio-cerebral events (MACCE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial (re)infarction, and stroke) and length of stay (LOS). Among 10,266 NSTEMI patients in China, coronary angiography was performed in 45.6% and revascularization in 40.9%, which was associated with reduced in-hospital MACCE (overall rate 6.7%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: