Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The emphasis on quantitative research over qualitative research in criminal justice has encountered strong criticism; yet it has endured. One dimension of its persistence concerns the organization of doctoral programs in the field. In this article I examine the extent and rationality of the quantitative emphasis within these programs. Course requirements in quantitative methods, relative to those in qualitative methods, are explored as indicators of this emphasis. I find support for the claim that doctoral education in criminal justice has gone beyond mere emphasis on quantitative methods, and has become a detrimental preoccupation. In addition to supplementing the ongoing critique of this emphasis, I consider the possibility of moderating it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bruce DiCristina (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: