Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper concerns voting with logical consequences, which means that anybody voting for an alternative x should vote for the logical consequences of x as well. Similarly, the social choice set is also supposed to be closed under logical consequences. The central result of the paper is that, given a set of fairly natural conditions, the only social choice functions that satisfy social logical closure are oligarchic (where a subset of the voters are decisive for the social choice). The set of conditions needed for the proof include a version of Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives that also plays a central role in Arrow's impossibility theorem.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter Gärdenfors (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: