Chronic kidney disease was associated with a lower warfarin maintenance dose (35.9 vs. 47.0 mg/week, P=0.003) and more frequent dose changes (22% vs. 12%, P<0.001) compared to patients without CKD.
Cohort (n=40)
Yes
Does chronic kidney disease alter warfarin maintenance dose requirements and decrease anticoagulation stability in patients managed in an anticoagulation clinic?
Chronic kidney disease is associated with lower warfarin dose requirements and decreased anticoagulation stability, necessitating more intensive clinic management.
Effect estimate: 24% lower dose
Absolute Event Rate: 35.9% vs 47%
p-value: p=0.003
BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that kidney disease affects hepatically cleared drugs. Accordingly, we hypothesized that chronic kidney disease (CKD) would disrupt anticoagulation of warfarin-treated patients and thereby increase the amount of management required to maintain appropriate anticoagulation. Specifically, we anticipated that more dose manipulations (both dose changes and transient dose adjustments) and shorter times between scheduled clinic visits would be required for anticoagulation patients with CKD. OBJECTIVES: To determine how CKD affected warfarin maintenance dose, anticoagulation stability, the proportion of clinic visits that necessitated a dose manipulation (either a change in the prescribed weekly dose or a transient dose adjustment), and the length of time between scheduled visits in 2 pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinics. METHODS: Our retrospective, cohort chart review investigated warfarin response in anticoagulation clinic patients. From the clinic database of patients with an international normalized ratio (INR) target range of 2.0-3.0, we matched 20 of 24 patients with CKD (estimated creatinine clearance less than 60 mL per minute) to 20 comparison group patients (estimated creatinine clearance greater than 60 mL per minute) based on parameters demonstrated to affect warfarin dose: ethnicity, gender, age, body surface area, and simvastatin use. We calculated the average weekly dose used to maintain target INR (assessment period range=116-1,408 days). To evaluate anticoagulation stability and patient management, we quantified several parameters, including the percentage of total time in therapeutic range, the proportion of clinic visits that required a dose change, and the time between scheduled visits. We compared group means using t-tests, and categorical data were compared using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Our population was predominantly female (75%) and of African ancestry (95%); average age 60 years. Patients with CKD required a 24% lower dose than the comparison group (mean SD=35.9 10.7 vs. 47.0 11.2 mg per week, P=0.003) and spent less time in therapeutic range required increased clinic management versus the comparison group, as indicated by a significantly higher proportion of clinic visits at which dose changes occurred (22% vs. 12%, P<0.001) and a decreased time between scheduled visits (mean SD of 16.0 3.2 days vs. 19.7 3.4 days, respectively, P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CKD was associated with both decreased warfarin maintenance dose and decreased anticoagulation stability which, in turn, required more frequent and intensive anticoagulation clinic management.
Kleinow et al. (Thu,) conducted a cohort in Warfarin anticoagulation (n=40). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) vs. Estimated creatinine clearance greater than 60 mL per minute was evaluated on Average weekly warfarin dose to maintain target INR (24% lower dose, p=0.003). Chronic kidney disease was associated with a lower warfarin maintenance dose (35.9 vs. 47.0 mg/week, P=0.003) and more frequent dose changes (22% vs. 12%, P<0.001) compared to patients without CKD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: