Text classification presents challenges due to the large number of features, their dependencies, and the large number of training documents. In this research, we investigate whether the use of words as features is appropriate for classification of documents to the ethnic group of their authors and/or to the historical period when they were written. To the best of our knowledge, these kinds of classifications have not been explored before by others. In addition, we investigate Forman's (Citation2003) claim about not using common words for classification tasks. The application domain was articles referring to Jewish law written in Hebrew-Aramaic, which have been little studied. Different experiments using SVM and InfoGain present highly successful results (more than 95%). The results indicate that the use of common words as features contribute to make the learning task efficient and more accurate. Notes 1http://www.biu.ac.il/ICJI/Responsa/index.html
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
HaCohen‐Kerner et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: