Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
I argue that epistemologists’ use of the term ‘epistemic’ has led to serious confusion in the discussion of epistemological issues. The source of the problem is that ‘epistemic’ functions largely as an undefined technical term. I show how this confusion has infected discussions of the nature of epistemic justification, epistemic norms for evidence gathering, and knowledge norms for assertion and belief.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stewart Cohen (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: