Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The purpose of this article is to locate children's own voices within the discourse of ‘disadvantaged children’. I commence by proposing that foregrounding vulnerable children's knowledge of protective factors may enable resiliency in similar scenarios. After that, from a positive psychology framework, I explicate the conceptual framework integrating constructs from resilience theory, featuring protective factors in a systemic model. Next I describe the action research design of a partnership study 1 1 A South African Department of Education and UNICEF partnership study to enable child-friendly environments in schools. in 78 schools in an impoverished rural province -focusing on the computer-based random sampling of 10 percent of the participants (n=2391), the development, piloting and translation of a mixed method questionnaire and the framework analysis of collected data. Then I introduce the emerged themes in terms of protective factors, locating most protection in the (disadvantaged) community, with the child as the central system negotiating adaptation. Subsequently I interpret the themes from my conceptual framework. I submit that the presence of cumulative protection will most probably enhance personal capacity. I also surmise that health-promoting schools may function as replacement safe spaces when safe family systems are lacking, whereas at-risk schools may aggravate the experience and consequences of unsafe family systems. I suggest that perceived capacity in the community system be built on to further support vulnerable children to be resilient. I conclude by suggesting some strategies for future research and intervention endeavours.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liesel Ebersöhn (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: