Key result
Obstructed breathing significantly increased 1-minute heart rate variability compared to control, with R-R interval standard deviation rising from 65 to 108 msec (P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Heart rate variability is usually measured over prolonged periods, and whether rapid changes during airway obstruction can be identified using a short 1-minute window was unknown.
Does a short 1-minute sampling of heart rate variability detect airway obstruction in healthy volunteers?
Does a short 1-minute sampling of heart rate variability detect airway obstruction in healthy volunteers?
A 1-minute sampling window of heart rate variability can rapidly detect airway obstruction with high sensitivity and specificity, offering a potential adjunct monitoring tool.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
1-min HRV sampling may detect obstruction in volunteers; leaves open clinical validation and utility.
Heart rate variability (HRV) reflects cardiac and autonomic nervous system activity. It is usually measured over a relatively prolonged period and presented using multiple parameters. Here, we studied rapid HRV changes during airway obstruction using a short (1 min) sampling window. Forty healthy volunteers underwent a trial of obstructed breathing. Heart rate was recorded during three consecutive sets comprised of 1-min control followed by 1 min of obstructed breathing, with 1 min of rest between sets. Time and frequency domain analysis were used to compare HRV during control versus obstructed breathing. Compared with control, HRV intensely increased during obstructed breathing: R-R intervals (time between consecutive R waves) standard deviation increased from 65 to 108 msec (P < 0.0001), root mean square of successive R-R interval from 61 to 82 msec (P = 0.001), number of pairs of successive R-R intervals that differ by more than 50 msec (NN50) from 16.5 to 25.3 events (P < 0.0001), and proportion of NN50 divided by total number of R-R intervals from 26.6 to 35.1% (P = 0.001). Low frequency power increased by more than fourfold (P < 0.0001), allowing 90% sensitivity and 75% specificity for identifying airway obstruction (ROC area 0.88, P < 0.0001). We observed a rapid intense increase in HRV during obstructed breathing, significant enough to detect during a short 1-min sampling window. These findings suggest that HRV may be useful for rapid detection of airway obstruction, especially in situations where end-tidal CO2 monitoring is not optimal, such as during partial airway obstruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lehavi et al. (2019) studied Airway obstruction (n=40). Obstructed breathing vs. Control (unobstructed breathing) was evaluated on R-R intervals standard deviation (p=<0.0001). Obstructed breathing significantly increased 1-minute heart rate variability compared to control, with R-R interval standard deviation rising from 65 to 108 msec (P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: