PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2006Circulation243 citationsOpen Access

Driving Times and Distances to Hospitals With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States

View Full Paper
Brahmajee K. Nallamothu
Brahmajee K. NallamothuQB3
Eric Bates
Eric BatesInterventional Cardiology
YWYongfei WangHeart Failure & Transplant

Key Result

In 2000, 79.0% of the US adult population lived within 60 minutes of a PCI hospital, and 74.0% of those closer to non-PCI hospitals would face <30 minutes of additional delay with direct referral.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

P
Population
Adults 18 years of age or older from the 2000 United States Census evaluated for driving times and distances to PCI hospitals.
O
Outcome
Proportion of the adult population who lived within 60 minutes of a PCI hospital and had additional transport times within 30 minutes if directly referred to a PCI hospital as opposed to a closer, non-PCI hospital

Nearly 80% of the US adult population lives within a 60-minute drive of a PCI hospital, suggesting that direct referral protocols for STEMI are geographically feasible for the majority of patients.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The success of prehospital triage protocols for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) will depend, in part, on how patients are geographically distributed around hospitals that perform percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Accordingly, we determined the proportion of the adult population in the United States with timely access to PCI hospitals using driving times and distances. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a cross-sectional study using hospital-level data from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey and Census tract-level data on adults 18 years of age or older from the 2000 United States Census. Our aims were to determine the proportion of the adult population who (1) lived within 60 minutes of a PCI hospital and (2) had additional transport times within 30 minutes if directly referred to a PCI hospital as opposed to a closer, non-PCI hospital. Median times and distances to the closest PCI hospital were 11.3 (interquartile range IQR 5.7 to 28.5) minutes and 7.9 (IQR 3.5 to 22.4) miles, respectively. A total of 79.0% of the adult population lived within 60 minutes of a PCI hospital. Among those with a non-PCI hospital as their closest facility, 74.0% required additional transport times of <30 minutes if directly referred to a PCI hospital as opposed to the non-PCI hospital. These estimates varied substantially across regions and urban, suburban, and rural Census tracts. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 80% of the adult population in the United States lived within 60 minutes of a PCI hospital in 2000. Even among those living closer to non-PCI hospitals, almost three fourths would experience <30 minutes of additional delay with direct referral to a PCI hospital, which suggests that such a strategy might be feasible for these individuals.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nallamothu et al. (2006) conducted a cross-sectional in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Geographic proximity to PCI hospitals vs. Closer, non-PCI hospital was evaluated on Proportion of the adult population living within 60 minutes of a PCI hospital. In 2000, 79.0% of the US adult population lived within 60 minutes of a PCI hospital, and 74.0% of those closer to non-PCI hospitals would face <30 minutes of additional delay with direct referral.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21b59f153b2036cbf1fa6chttps://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.596346
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper