Key result
Discrepancies in cardiac rehabilitation outcome findings may relate more to problems with assessment methodologies than to the rehabilitation interventions themselves.
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
Cardiac rehabilitation outcomes warrant cautious interpretation; leaves open true efficacy until assessment methodologies are standardized.
Highlights the need for standardized and comprehensive outcome assessment in cardiac rehabilitation to avoid discrepancies in findings.
Theresa Hoskins Michel (1992) conducted a review in Cardiac rehabilitation. Cardiac rehabilitation outcome assessment was evaluated. Discrepancies in cardiac rehabilitation outcome findings may relate more to problems with assessment methodologies than to the rehabilitation interventions themselves.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: