Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Twenty-seven patients received 2 microimplants each during implant surgery. One microimplant was blasted with 25 microm sized particles of TiO(2); the other was left as machined i.e. a turned surface. Before insertion the surface topography was characterized with an optical confocal laser profilometer. The surface roughness was greater than standard implants, and was similar for both surface modifications averaging over all parts of the implant i.e. tops, valley and flanks. The mean surface roughness from flank measurements only replicated previously reported findings: i.e. significantly rougher surfaces on blasted implants. After a mean healing period of 6.3 months in the maxillae and 3.9 months in the mandible, the microimplants and surrounding tissue were removed with a trephine burr. The histomorphometrical evaluation demonstrated significantly higher bone-to-implant contact for the blasted implants, inserted in the maxilla or in the mandible. Significantly more bone was found inside the threaded area for the blasted implants in the mandible, but there was no difference for implants positioned in maxillae.
Ivanoff et al. (2001) studied this question.