Approaching women's economic niches and earnings inferiority from the point of view of the ethnic economy literature, this paper introduces new data on women's entrepreneurship. Like ethnic minority employers, who prefer co-ethnic employees, women employers exhibit a hiring preference for women. As it does for ethnic minorities, this hiring preference modestly corrects women's earning inferiority, but it does not reduce industrial niching. Although often conflated, segregation and earnings are two distinct dimensions, not one. Women employers increase demand for women employees, raising their earnings, but women employers do not also reduce gender segregation. Because women are under-represented in entrepreneurship, the corrective effect of women's entrepreneurship on women's earnings is modest but positive. This result also parallels the limited advantage that ethnic employers afford co-ethnics. Therefore, in a technical sense, under-representation of women in entrepreneurship is an unacknowledged cause of women's earnings inferiority. Women's entrepreneurship will not reach parity with men's in the short run. But, in the longer run, women's entrepreneurship has the potential, appreciably if not fully, to reduce women's earnings inferiority. Keywords: Immigrant EntrepreneurshipWomen's EntrepreneurshipEarnings InferiorityHiring Preferences Notes 1. For a major recent contribution to this research, see Wilson (Citation2001). This paper reports on a study of labour market niches involving 100 ethnic groups living in 216 metropolitan areas of the United States in 1990. 2. For reviews of this literature see Light (2005), Light and Gold (Citation2000) and Light and Karageorgis (Citation1994). 3. Blau's (1977: 29–31) section on ‘employer hiring practices’ did not distinguish male and female employers, merely assuming that all employers were male. Additional informationNotes on contributorsIvan Light Ivan Light is Professor of Sociology at the University of California, Los Angeles
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ivan Light (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: