Introduction: APecR was a self – health profiling program with natural physical activity which came to one APecR = 138 Kcl burnt and was registered as one measured unit or patterned (LY2019004970- 28/8/19). Method: Field experimental to justify the effectiveness of APecR as profiling tool. 21 participants voluntarily as they were from previous study with continuity another 3 cycles (3 months’ time, same year). Results: Lifestyle which was categorized as Very Active (> 12,000 steps) = 10.2%, Active (> 10,000 steps) = 43.7%, Moderate (7,500 - 9,999 steps) = 37%, Not Active (50000 – 7499 steps) = 10.0% and without Sedentary lifestyle (< 5,000 steps) after the eventual APecR. Overall mean steps and Kilocalories burnt liked: October - 12,161 steps, and burn with 3.8 APecR (524.4Kcl), November - 13,197 steps, burned with 3.5 APecR (483Kcl) and December with average steps - 12, 005, and burn up to 5.3 APecR (731.4Kcl). Sleeping pattern showed on bed time was prolong from 7 hours 6 second (October) to 7 hours and 16 minutes (December). Weight Lose and Heart Rate: October with weight 81.5Kg, BP reading Excel = 120/80 - 31%, Normal = 130/85- 35%, Normal Systolic = 140/90- 32% and Mild Hyper (2%). In December weight scale slightly dropped to 80.3Kg and blood pressure with Excel (34%), Normal (45%), Normal Systolic = 19% and Mild = 2%. Conclusion: ApecR contributed to practices, delivering fitness towrads health knowledge and post effect of APecR as unit measured and technique proven as an enhancing maintenance domain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: