The “above‐average effect” is the phenomenon that people tend to judge themselves above average on desirable traits. Based on social identity theory, we propose that a “below‐average effect” may arise when individuals rate themselves and the average ingroup member on traits stereotypically associated with the ingroup. In two studies, R epublican and D emocrat participants rated themselves and the average political ingroup member on possession of desirable traits related to warmth and competence. Current political stereotypes in A merica associate the former dimension with D emocrats and the latter with R epublicans. Consistent with our hypothesis, the above‐average effect was moderated by political group and dimension in interaction. In particular, D emocrats rated themselves below the average D emocrat on warmth and R epublicans rated themselves below the average R epublican on competence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eriksson et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: