Key result
Vascular age estimation based on relative risk outperforms chronological age across 27 indirect aging indicators.
Why the study?
Current vascular age models rely on chronological age regressions that fail to account for individual differences in vascular aging, potentially leading to inaccurate cardiovascular disease risk assessment.
Does a vascular age estimation method based on relative risk difference in vascular aging provide better correlation with vascular aging indicators compared to chronological age?
Does a vascular age estimation method based on relative risk difference in vascular aging provide better correlation with vascular aging indicators compared to chronological age?
A novel method for estimating vascular age incorporating individual differences in vascular aging correlates better with vascular aging indicators than chronological age.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May enhance vascular aging assessment over chronological age in research; hypothesis-generating, requiring validation before clinical consideration.
OBJECTIVE: The current models of estimating vascular age (VA) primarily rely on the regression label expressed with chronological age (CA), which does not account individual differences in vascular aging (IDVA) that are difficult to describe by CA. This may lead to inaccuracies in assessing the risk of cardiovascular disease based on VA. To address this limitation, this work aims to develop a new method for estimating VA by considering IDVA. This method will provide a more accurate assessment of cardiovascular disease risk. METHODS: Relative risk difference in vascular aging (RRDVA) is proposed to replace IDVA, which is represented as the numerical difference between individual predicted age (PA) and the corresponding mean PA of healthy population. RRDVA and CA are regard as the influence factors to acquire VA. In order to acquire PA of all samples, this work takes CA as the dependent variable, and mines the two most representative indicators from arteriosclerosis data as the independent variables, to establish a regression model for obtaining PA. RESULTS: The proposed VA based on RRDVA is significantly correlated with 27 indirect indicators for vascular aging evaluation. Moreover, VA is better than CA by comparing the correlation coefficients between VA, CA and 27 indirect indicators, and RRDVA greater than zero presents a higher risk of disease. CONCLUSION: The proposed VA overcomes the limitation of CA in characterizing IDVA, which may help young groups with high disease risk to promote healthy behaviors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2024) studied Vascular aging. Vascular age estimation based on relative risk difference in vascular aging (RRDVA) vs. Chronological age was evaluated on Correlation with 27 indirect indicators for vascular aging evaluation. Vascular age estimation based on relative risk difference in vascular aging was significantly correlated with 27 indirect indicators, outperforming chronological age.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: