Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper I ahve shown that scores on the AFQT are a function of family and school level material resources and investments on individual development. The AFQT is not a measure of “intelligence (IQ),” “ability,” or “cognitive skills.” The AFQT is in large part a measure of access to material resources, social investments, and exposure to the values, experiences, and networks of the white upper middle class.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Héctor R. Cordero‐Guzmán (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: