This study was conducted to explore a comprehensive belief system model of pre-service science teachers’ (PSTs’) beliefs and to examine the reasons why and how these beliefs are in/consistent with each other. A sequential explanatory research design guided the study, with a quantitative approach being followed by a qualitative one. Participating in the quantitative research were 955 PSTs. The results of a structural equation modeling analysis of the dataset indicated that PSTs’ depressive beliefs were related to their epistemological beliefs and that these latter beliefs predicted their teaching-learning conceptions. Twelve PSTs participated in a follow-up research that employed a multiple case research design. Results, at this step, indicated that there was a relationship between a PST’s beliefs and experiences. Furthermore, if any inconsistencies between experiences and peripheral beliefs existed, the relationship was biased toward experiences. Therefore, the experience-biased calibration determined that central beliefs have a greater influence on peripheral beliefs than vice versa. Given these results, certain implications are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bahçivan et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: