This study assessed the reliability of nine different measures used in reading and typographic research. Test-retest correlations were calculated for university students and schoolchildren, both male and female. It was clear that some measures were more reliable than others: for example, oral reading was highly reliable, but comprehension was not. The results are discussed with reference to the objectives of different types of measure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hartley et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: