Key result
Progressive carotid stenosis increases the circulation core fraction in the post-stenotic region regardless of patient-specific features, while altering pulsatility index and Q-criterion patterns.
Why the study?
Progression of carotid stenosis alters proximal and distal hemodynamics, but conventional studies analyze only the stenosis region rather than extended arterial domains that avoid artificial inlet conditions and permit automatic flow redistribution.
Computational fluid dynamics modeling of the extended aortic-cerebral vasculature introduces a novel circulation core fraction index to quantify progressive hemodynamic alterations and recirculation patterns during carotid stenosis.
Hypothesis-generating in animal CFD models; leaves open human validation of circulation core fraction for carotid stenosis.
Progression of carotid stenosis (CS) significantly reduces blood flow in the affected arteries and alters both proximal and distal hemodynamics. While conventional studies consider only the stenosis region for analysis, an extended larger arterial domain of aortic–cerebral vasculature is used to avoid artificial modeling of the inlet condition to the carotid region and facilitate automatic flow redistribution during CS progression. The fluid domain was constructed and simulated using an open-source package SimVascular, and three patient models with five stenosis cases each were created using medical images. Newtonian, incompressible, and rigid-wall conditions were assumed because of the high computational burden, and boundary conditions of the lumped Windkessel and pulsatile flow rate were implemented for the outlets and inlet, respectively. We present a novel index called circulation core fraction (CCF) to quantify and visualize the stenosis-driven hemodynamics; the CCF is developed from the benchmark backward-facing step problem and compares the representative recirculation to the total volume. Thus, CCF in the post-stenotic region increases during CS progression regardless of patient-specific features whereas that in the pre-stenotic region exhibits patient-specific nature despite the incremental tendency. Streamlines with custom sources show a helical vortex with recirculation and artery-wise flow streams that vary during CS progression. We also report transitional patterns in both the pulsatility index (PI) contours and Q-criterion, where the PI values shift from high–low–high to high–low–low across the stenosis, and the latter is nearly absent at 0% and 95% but mostly present at 50% and 75% CS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2022) studied Carotid stenosis (n=3). Progressive carotid stenosis vs. Different degrees of stenosis (0%, 50%, 75%, 95%) was evaluated on Hemodynamic flow characteristics (circulation core fraction, pulsatility index, Q-criterion). Progressive carotid stenosis increases the circulation core fraction in the post-stenotic region regardless of patient-specific features, while altering pulsatility index and Q-criterion patterns.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: