) to discriminate sound sequences with regular intervals from sound sequences with irregular intervals using a go/no-go paradigm. We used four different tempi in the training sessions and two new tempi in the tests. We found that both rats and humans responded more to the novel regular test sequences than to the novel irregular test sequences. Differently from previous studies with birds, rats seem to have focused on the relative duration of the sounds, which means that they paid attention to global features defining the regularity of the sequences. In sum, this study suggests that detecting temporal regularities in sequences of sounds may have ancient evolutionary roots and could rely on timing mechanisms present in distantly related mammals. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Celma-Miralles et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: