Why the study?
Does early psychological attention improve metabolic control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus patients?
Does early psychological attention improve metabolic control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus patients?
Early psychological intervention in T2DM patients may be a crucial coadjuvant for achieving adequate metabolic control and improving quality of life.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support adjunctive psychological care in T2DM; leaves open need for RCTs before practice change.
Background and aims: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is currently a public health emergency that requires inter- and multidisciplinary medical services. The principal aim of the present work was to review the basic factors related to the possible advantages of providing early psychological attention to T2DM patients as a coadjuvant for achieving adequate metabolic control. Material and methods: A literature review was conducted to explore the interaction between stress and depression and the relation of both to the ability of T2DM patients to effectively manage their disease. Results: It was found that stress is one of the factors linked to the etiology of depression, which is a disorder with high prevalence in diabetic patients. Consequently, an inter- and multidisciplinary approach to treating diabetic patients was developed. One of the main focuses of this approach is early psychological attention, starting shortly after the initial diagnosis. Conclusions: The ability to create consciousness among health care professionals about the importance of early psychological attention for T2DM patients under an inter- and multidisciplinary strategy could possibly improve pharmacological adherence, metabolic control, the quality of life and the life expectancy of patients, as well as save economic resources for patient families and health institutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Briones-Aranda et al. (2018) conducted a review in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Early psychological attention was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: