Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High-throughput DNA testing is becoming established as a standard diagnostic test in the renal clinic. Previously published studies on cohorts of patients with unexplained chronic kidney disease of a suspected genetic aetiology have suggested a diagnostic yield for genomic sequencing of up to 18%. Here we determine the yield of targeted gene panel in a clinically unscreened cohort of patients referred for percutaneous native renal biopsy. Patients who underwent renal biopsy for investigation of chronic kidney disease were sequenced using a genomic sequencing panel covering 227 genes in which variation is known to be associated with monogenic chronic kidney disease (CKD). Candidate disease-causing variants were assessed for pathogenicity using guidelines from the American College for Medical Genetics and Genomics. Fifty CKD patients were recruited and sequenced. A molecular diagnosis was obtained for two patients (4%). A molecular diagnosis is possible using genomic testing in ∼4% of clinically unscreened patients undergoing renal biopsy. Genetic screening may be useful for diagnosis in a subset of CKD patients but is most valuable when applied to patients with suspected heritable forms of kidney disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benson et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: