Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ionic polymer?metal composites (IPMCs) have been considered for various applications due to their light weight, large bending, and low actuation voltage requirements. However, their response can be slow and vary widely, depending on various factors such as fabrication processes, water content, and contact conditions with the electrodes. In order to utilize their capability in various high-performance microelectromechanical systems, controllers need to address this uncertainty and non-repeatability while improving the response speed. In this work, we identified an empirical model for the dynamic relationship between the applied voltage and the IPMC beam deflection, which includes the uncertainties and variations of the response. Then, four types of controller were designed, and their performances were compared: a proportional?integral?derivative (PID) controller with optimized gains using a co-evolutionary algorithm, and three types of robust controller based on , with loop shaping, and ?-synthesis, respectively. Our results show that the robust control techniques can significantly improve the IPMC performance against non-repeatability or parametric uncertainties, in terms of the faster response and lower overshoot than the PID control, using lower actuation voltage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: