Why the study?
Do trait affiliation and control predict ambulatory blood pressure and momentary affective experiences in married couples?
Do trait affiliation and control predict ambulatory blood pressure and momentary affective experiences in married couples?
Trait dominance is associated with higher blood pressure in men, while trait affiliation is associated with lower systolic blood pressure in both sexes, highlighting a potential psychosocial mechanism for cardiovascular risk.
Associated with higher BP in dominant men; hypothesis-generating for trait effects on couples' ambulatory BP.
OBJECTIVE: Based in interpersonal theory, the present study tested associations of trait affiliation (i.e., warmth vs. hostility) and control (i.e., dominance vs. submissiveness) with ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and momentary affective experiences. METHODS: Ninety-four married couples (mean age 29.6) completed trait affiliation and control measures, and a 1-day protocol with random interval-contingent measurements of ABP and affective experience. RESULTS: Higher trait control (i.e., dominance) predicted higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP) in men, but not in women. For both men and women, high affiliation predicted lower SBP. These associations occurred within individuals (i.e., actor effects) but not between spouses (i.e., partner effects). Dominance and affiliation also predicted momentary affect. CONCLUSIONS: Associations of dominance and affiliation with ABP may indicate a mechanism by which trait social behavior influences CVD risk. These findings also illustrate the interpersonal perspective as an integrative framework for research on psychosocial risk for CVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baron et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: