A naturally occurring public speaking stressor elicited elevated systolic blood pressure and heart rate in anxious adolescents, and elevated diastolic blood pressure in angry adolescents.
Observational (n=23)
ABSTRACT The present investigation examined the behavioral and psychophysiological characteristics of 23 adolescents who differed in levels of blood pressure and heart rate prior to and following a naturally occurring stressor–giving a required five‐minute speech in a high school English class. Measured characteristics were Type A behavior, hostility and anger, trait anxiety, family history of hypertension, and blood pressure and heart rate responses to three standardized laboratory stressors (serial subtraction, star‐tracing, and handgrip tasks). Results showed that anxious adolescents achieved elevated levels of systolic blood pressure and heart rate during public speaking relative to the next English class, whereas angry adolescents achieved elevated levels of diastolic blood pressure. Those adolescents who exhibited exaggerated increases in the cardiovascular measures while performing laboratory tasks also achieved elevated levels of blood pressure and/or heart rate during the naturally occurring stressor, but the strength of the relationships varied across tasks and physiological parameters. These findings should be viewed as tentative because of the uniqueness and size of the sample.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Psychophysiology
University of Pittsburgh
Miami University
Add This Paper to Your Research Feed
Any time a new paper drops it will be there.
Matthews et al. (Sat,) reported a observational. Naturally occurring stressor (public speaking) vs. Next English class was evaluated on Blood pressure and heart rate responses. A naturally occurring public speaking stressor elicited elevated systolic blood pressure and heart rate in anxious adolescents, and elevated diastolic blood pressure in angry adolescents.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: