PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 2023IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control39 citations

Online Distributed Optimization With Nonconvex Objective Functions via Dynamic Regrets

View Full Paper
KLKaihong LuLWLong Wang

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In this article, the problem of online distributed optimization subject to a convex set is studied by employing a network of agents, where the objective functions allocated to agents are nonconvex. Each agent only has access to its own objective function information at the previous time, and can only communicate with its immediate neighbors via a time-varying directed graph. To tackle this problem, first, a new online distributed algorithm with gradient information is proposed based on consensus algorithms and projection-free strategies. Of particular interest is that dynamic regrets, whose offline benchmarks are to pursue the stationary points at each time, are employed to measure the performance of the algorithm. Under mild assumptions on the graph and the objective functions, we prove that if the deviation in the objective function sequence is sublinear with the square root of the time horizon, and if the deviation in the gradient sequence is sublinear with the time horizon, then dynamic regrets grow sublinearly. Second, considering the case where the gradient information of the objective functions is not available, we propose a zeroth-order online distributed projection-free algorithm, by which agents make decisions only depending on the random zeroth-order oracle. It turns out that under the same conditions as in the first case, if the smoothing parameters in the random zeroth-order oracles scale inversely with the time horizon, then the expectations of dynamic regrets increase sublinearly. Finally, simulations are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of our theoretical results.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lu et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21e7ed965ac14388492271https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2023.3239432
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Online Distributed Optimization With Strongly Pseudoconvex-Sum Cost Functions2019 · 66 citations
  2. 2Random Gradient-Free Minimization of Convex Functions2015 · 882 citations
  3. 3Revisiting Frank-Wolfe: Projection-Free Sparse Convex Optimization2013 · 892 citations