Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-national case studies have indicated that compared to other economically advanced democracies, American methods of policy implementation and dispute resolution are more adversarial and legalistic, shaped by costly court action or the prospect of it. To what extent are lawyers responsible for creating American-style adversarial legalism? This article argues that while adversarial legalism stems primarily from enduring features of American political culture and governmental structure, the legal profession plays a significant independent role in promoting and perpetuating this mode of governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert A. Kagan (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: