PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2011257 citations

A Unified Continuous Greedy Algorithm for Submodular Maximization

View Full Paper
MFMoran FeldmanJNJoseph NaorRSRoy Schwartz

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The study of combinatorial problems with a submodular objective function has attracted much attention in recent years, and is partly motivated by the importance of such problems to economics, algorithmic game theory and combinatorial optimization. Classical works on these problems are mostly combinatorial in nature. Recently, however, many results based on continuous algorithmic tools have emerged. The main bottleneck of such continuous techniques is how to approximately solve a non-convex relaxation for the sub- modular problem at hand. Thus, the efficient computation of better fractional solutions immediately implies improved approximations for numerous applications. A simple and elegant method, called "continuous greedy", successfully tackles this issue for monotone submodular objective functions, however, only much more complex tools are known to work for general non-monotone submodular objectives. In this work we present a new unified continuous greedy algorithm which finds approximate fractional solutions for both the non-monotone and monotone cases, and improves on the approximation ratio for many applications. For general non-monotone submodular objective functions, our algorithm achieves an improved approximation ratio of about 1/e. For monotone submodular objective functions, our algorithm achieves an approximation ratio that depends on the density of the polytope defined by the problem at hand, which is always at least as good as the previously known best approximation ratio of 1-1/e. Some notable immediate implications are an improved 1/e-approximation for maximizing a non-monotone submodular function subject to a matroid or O(1)-knapsack constraints, and information-theoretic tight approximations for Submodular Max-SAT and Submodular Welfare with k players, for any number of players k. A framework for submodular optimization problems, called the contention resolution framework, was introduced recently by Chekuri et al. 11. The improved approximation ratio of the unified continuous greedy algorithm implies improved ap- proximation ratios for many problems through this framework. Moreover, via a parameter called stopping time, our algorithm merges the relaxation solving and re-normalization steps of the framework, and achieves, for some applications, further improvements. We also describe new monotone balanced con- tention resolution schemes for various matching, scheduling and packing problems, thus, improving the approximations achieved for these problems via the framework.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Feldman et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21e95ce8ef4064f24e92d9https://doi.org/10.1109/focs.2011.46
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Approximations for Monotone and Nonmonotone Submodular Maximization with Knapsack Constraints2013 · 90 citations
  2. 2Submodular Maximization over Multiple Matroids via Generalized Exchange Properties2010 · 176 citations
  3. 3Untitled2010 · 81 citations
  4. 4Approximating the throughput of multiple machines under real-time scheduling1999 · 60 citations
  5. 5The budgeted maximum coverage problem1999 · 1,004 citations