PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2004Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics423 citations

From R&D to Productivity Growth: Do the Institutional Settings and the Source of Funds of R&D Matter?

View Full Paper
DGDominique GuellecBPBruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents estimates of the long‐term impact of various sources of knowledge (R&D performed by the business sector, the public sector and foreign firms) on multifactor productivity growth of 16 countries from 1980 to 1998. The main results show that the three sources of knowledge are significant determinants of long‐term productivity growth. Further evidence suggests that several factors determine the extent to which each source of knowledge contributes to productivity growth. These factors are the absorptive capability, the origin of funding, the socioeconomic objectives of government support, and the type of public institutions that perform R&D.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Guellec et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21ea492221fd35d149225chttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2004.00083.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms' Patents, Profits and Market Value1986 · 2,863 citations
  2. 2R&D Investment and International Productivity Differences1992 · 213 citations
  3. 3Economic Approaches to Innovation1995 · 88 citations
  4. 4R&D and absorptive capacity: from theory to data2001 · 36 citations
  5. 5Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R & D1989 · 7,580 citations