Why the study?
Do patient and hospital factors influence the use of neuraxial anesthesia or peripheral nerve block in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty?
Do patient and hospital factors influence the use of neuraxial anesthesia or peripheral nerve block in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty?
Significant disparities exist in the provision of regional anesthetic care for orthopedic procedures based on race, insurance type, and hospital teaching status.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Disparities in neuraxial anesthesia by race and payer warrant awareness but should not yet change practice; hypothesis-generating for equity interventions in arthroplasty.
AbstractAbstract In a review of more than 1 million hip and knee arthroplasty procedures in the Premier Perspective database, use of neuraxial anesthesia was considerably less (odds ratio [OR], 0.35) in teaching versus nonteaching hospitals and moderately less for black patients (OR, 0.88), those on Medicaid (OR, 0.78), and those without insurance (OR, 0.89). Background Differences in health care represent a major health policy issue. Despite increasing evidence on the mediating role of anesthesia type used for surgery on perioperative outcome, there is a lack of data on potential care differences in this field. The authors aimed to determine whether anesthesia practice (use of neuraxial anesthesia [NA] or peripheral nerve block [PNB]) differs by patient and hospital factors. Methods The authors extracted data on n = 1,062,152 hip and knee arthroplasty procedures from the Premier Perspective database (2006 to 2013). Multilevel multivariable logistic regression models measured associations (odds ratios [ORs] and 95% CIs) between patient/hospital factors and NA or PNB use. Results Of all patients, 22.2% (n = 236,083) received NA and 17.9% (n = 189,732) received PNB. Lower adjusted odds for receiving NA were seen for black patients (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.91) and those on Medicaid (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.82) or without insurance (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.98). Furthermore, teaching hospitals (compared with nonteaching hospitals) had lower adjusted odds for NA utilization (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.89). Although generally similar patterns were seen for PNB utilization, the main difference was that particularly Hispanic patients were less likely to receive PNB compared with white patients (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.65). Sensitivity analyses generally validated our results. Conclusions Significant differences exist in the provision of regional anesthetic care with factors such as race and insurance type being important determinants of anesthetic practice. Further and in-depth research is needed to fully assess the background of these differences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Memtsoudis et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: