Thirty-two Ru(porp)L(2) complexes have been synthesized, where porp = the dianion of meso-tetramesitylporphyrin (TMP) or meso-tetrakis(4-methylphenyl)porphyrin (H(2)T-pMe-PP), and L = a thiol, a sulfide, a disulfide, or a trisulfide. Species studied were with RSH [R = Me, Et, (n)Pr, (i)Pr, (t)Bu, Bn (benzyl), and Ph], RSR (R = Me, Bn), RSSR (R = Me, Et, (n)Pr, Bn) and MeSS(t)Bu, and RSSSR (R = Me, Bn). All the species except two, which were the isolated Ru(T-pMe-PP)((t)BuSH)(2) and Ru(TMP)(MeSSMe)(2), were characterized in situ. The disulfide complex was characterized by X-ray analysis. (1)H NMR data for the coordinated thiols are the first reported within metalloporphyrin systems, and are especially informative because of the upfield shifts of the axial sulfur-containing ligands due to the porphyrin π-ring current effect, which is also present in the di- and trisulfide species. The disulfide in the solid state structure of Ru(TMP)(MeSSMe)(2) is η(1)(end-on) coordinated, the first example of such bonding in a nontethered, acyclic dialkyl disulfide; (1)H-(1)H EXSY NMR data in solution show that the species undergoes 1,2-S-metallotropic shifts. Stepwise formation of the bis(disulfide) complex from Ru(TMP)(MeCN)(2) in solution occurs with a cooperativity effect, resembling behavior of Fe(II)-porphyrin systems where crystal field effects dominate, but ligand trans-effects are more likely in the Ru system. The η(1)(end-on) coordination mode is also favored for the trisulfide ligand. Discussed also are the remarkable linear correlations that exist between the ring-current shielding shifts for the axial ligand C(1) protons of Ru(porp)(RS(x)R)(2) and x (the number of S atoms). The Introduction briefly reviews literature on Ru- and Fe porphyrins (including heme proteins) with sulfur-containing ligands or substrates, and relationships between our findings and this literature are discussed throughout the paper.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rebouças et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: