The specific activity (πA) of a whole cell acid urease preparation was assessed in model wine solutions at different levels of malic (M) and lactic acids, metabisulfite, ethanol, and pH by performing a central composite design. M and then pH were found to be the most controlling variables, their effects being practically coincident but of opposite sign. For urea concentrations up to ≈1 mol m-3 the ammonium formation rate was assumed of the pseudo-first-order with respect to urea, this being confirmed by two independent validation tests performed at 20 °C for as long as 24 h. In the case of real wines the effective pseudo-first-order kinetic rate constants were found to be smaller than those pertaining to the model solutions having the same wine composition and pH by a factor varying from 10 to 1000, this affecting significantly the specific urease treatment costs per liter of wine treated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fidaleo et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: