Prospective cohort study examines diet adherence, heart disease risk, and environmental impact in adults, suggesting significant benefits.
Objectives To construct a diet-score measuring the level of adherence to the Healthy Reference Diet (HRD), to explore whether adherence to the HRD is associated with coronary heart disease (CHD), all-cause mortality risk, and to calculate its environmental impact. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting The Dutch contribution to the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-NL). Participants 37,349 adults (20-70y) without CHD at baseline. Main outcome measures Primary outcomes were incident CHD and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were greenhouse gas emission (GHGE), land use, blue water use, freshwater eutrophication, marine eutrophication, and terrestrial acidification. Results During a median 15.3-year follow-up, 2,543 cases of CHD occurred, and 5,648 individuals died from all causes. The average HRD-score was 73 (SD=10). High adherence to the HRD was associated with a 15% lower risk of CHD (hazard ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.75 to 0.96), as well as a 17% lower risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.77 to 0.90) in multivariable-adjusted models. Better adherence to the HRD was associated with lower environmental impact from GHGE (β= -0.10 kg CO2-eq, 95% confidence interval -0.13 to -0.07), land use (β= -0.11 m 2 per year, 95% confidence interval -0.12 to -0.09), freshwater eutrophication (β= -0.000002 kg P-eq, 95% confidence interval -0.000004 to -0.000001), marine eutrophication (β= -0.00035 kg N-eq, 95% confidence interval -0.00042 to -0.00029), and terrestrial acidification (β = -0.004 kg SO2-eq, 95% confidence interval -0.004 to -0.003), but with higher environmental impact from blue water use (β=0.044 m 3 , 95% confidence interval 0.043 to 0.045). Conclusion High adherence to the HRD was associated with lower risk of CHD and all-cause mortality. Additionally, increasing adherence to the HRD could lower some aspects of the environmental impact of diets, but attention is needed for the associated increase in blue water use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colizzi et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: