Key result
Antares algorithm accurately estimates central SBP within ~1 mmHg of invasive measurement in diabetes.
Why the study?
Diabetes may differentially affect elastic and muscular arteries, potentially limiting the accuracy of non-invasive pulse wave analysis devices for estimating central blood pressure.
Does the non-invasive Antares algorithm accurately estimate central blood pressure compared to invasive measurements in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Cross-Sectional (n=119)
Yes
Does the non-invasive Antares algorithm accurately estimate central blood pressure compared to invasive measurements in patients with type 2 diabetes?
The Antares algorithm integrated into a conventional oscillometric arm cuff provides accurate estimation of central aortic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Supports non-invasive central SBP estimation in type 2 diabetes; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
INTRODUCTION: Antares is a pulse wave analysis (PWA) algorithm designed to allow a non-invasive estimation of central (aortic) blood pressure (cBP) using automated oscillometric blood pressure (BP) devices. Diabetes may affect elastic and muscular arteries differently, resulting in disparate pulse wave characteristics in central and peripheral arteries, which may limit the accuracy of PWA devices. The aim of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of Antares for estimating cBP as compared with invasively measured cBP in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this study, consecutive patients undergoing elective coronary angiography were recruited between November 2017 and September 2020. In 119 patients with type 2 diabetes, cBP was measured invasively and simultaneously determined non-invasively using the custo screen 400 device with the integrated Antares algorithm. RESULTS: The mean difference between the estimated and invasively measured cBP was 1.2±6.3 mmHg for central systolic BP (cSBP), 1.0±4.3 mmHg for central mean arterial pressure (cMAP) and 3.6±5.7 mmHg for central diastolic BP (cDBP). High correlations were found between estimated cBP and invasively measured cBP (cSBP: r=0.916; cMAP: r=0.882; cDBP: r=0.791; all p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that the Antares algorithm incorporated into the custo screen 400 device can estimate cBP with high accuracy turning a conventional oscillometric BP device into a type II device for the non-invasive estimation of cBP, which is applicable in patients with type 2 diabetes. Integration of Antares into commercially available BP devices could facilitate the introduction of cBP into routine clinical practice as a part of disease and risk management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stäuber et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 diabetes (n=119). Antares algorithm non-invasive central blood pressure estimation vs. Invasive central (aortic) blood pressure measurement via cardiac catheterization was evaluated on Mean difference between estimated and invasively measured central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) (Mean difference 1.2 ± 6.3 mmHg (r=0.916), p=<0.001). The Antares algorithm accurately estimated central systolic blood pressure compared to invasive measurement with a mean difference of 1.2 mmHg (r=0.916, p<0.001) in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: