Key result
High neuroticism was consistently associated with greater frailty cross-sectionally (adjusted β 0.32 in UK Biobank) and longitudinally up to 29 years (adjusted β 0.24 in SALT).
Why the study?
Neuroticism is associated with poor health outcomes, but its contribution to the accumulation of health deficits in old age is largely unknown.
Does high neuroticism predict the accumulation of frailty in old age?
Observational (n=298,125)
Yes
Does high neuroticism predict the accumulation of frailty in old age?
Neuroticism in midlife predicts frailty in late life, with both environmental and genetic influences contributing to this relationship.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant neuroticism screening in midlife frailty risk models; extends longitudinal associations but leaves causal effects and interventions open.
OBJECTIVE: Neuroticism is associated with poor health outcomes, but its contribution to the accumulation of health deficits in old age, that is, the frailty index, is largely unknown. We aimed to explore associations between neuroticism and frailty cross-sectionally and longitudinally, and to investigate the contribution of shared genetic influences. METHODS: Data were derived from the UK Biobank (UKB; n = 274,951), the Australian Over 50's Study (AO50; n = 2849), and the Swedish Twin Registry (Screening Across the Lifespan of Twins Study [SALT], n = 18,960; The Swedish Adoption/Twin Study of Aging [SATSA], n = 1365). Associations between neuroticism and the frailty index were investigated using regression analysis cross-sectionally in UKB, AO50, and SATSA and longitudinally in SALT (25-29 years of follow-up) and SATSA (6 and 23 years of follow-up). The co-twin control method was applied to explore the contribution of underlying shared familial factors (SALT, SATSA, AO50). Genome-wide polygenic risk scores for neuroticism were used in all samples to further assess whether common genetic variants associated with neuroticism predict frailty. RESULTS: High neuroticism was consistently associated with greater frailty cross-sectionally (adjusted β [95% confidence intervals] in UKB = 0.32 [0.32-0.33]; AO50 = 0.35 [0.31-0.39]; SATSA = 0.33 [0.27-0.39]) and longitudinally up to 29 years (SALT = 0.24 [0.22-0.25]; SATSA 6 years = 0.31 [0.24-0.38]; SATSA 23 years = 0.16 [0.07-0.25]). When adjusting for underlying shared genetic and environmental factors, the neuroticism-frailty association remained significant, although decreased. Polygenic risk scores for neuroticism significantly predicted frailty in the two larger samples (meta-analyzed total β = 0.059 [0.055-0.062]). CONCLUSIONS: Neuroticism in midlife predicts frailty in late life. Neuroticism may have a causal influence on frailty, whereas both environmental and genetic influences, including neuroticism-associated common genetic variants, contribute to this relationship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daníelsdóttir et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Frailty in old age (n=298,125). Neuroticism vs. Lower neuroticism was evaluated on Frailty index (β 0.32, 95% CI 0.32-0.33). High neuroticism was consistently associated with greater frailty cross-sectionally (adjusted β 0.32 in UK Biobank) and longitudinally up to 29 years (adjusted β 0.24 in SALT).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: