Key result
Thai Cardiovascular Risk score shows poor discrimination for predicting mild cognitive impairment.
Why the study?
Individuals with metabolic risks are at high risk of cognitive impairment, but whether the Thai Cardiovascular Risk score can predict mild cognitive impairment in Thai adults with metabolic risks remains uninvestigated.
Does the Thai Cardiovascular Risk (TCVR) score predict mild cognitive impairment in adults with metabolic risk factors?
Cross-Sectional (n=421)
No
Does the Thai Cardiovascular Risk (TCVR) score predict mild cognitive impairment in adults with metabolic risk factors?
Standard cardiovascular risk assessment models utilizing anthropometric and routine laboratory data provide limited discriminative ability for predicting mild cognitive impairment in patients with metabolic risk factors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thai CV risk scores lack utility for MCI prediction in metabolic patients; leaves open need for dedicated cognitive risk models.
Individuals with metabolic risks are at high risk of cognitive impairment. We aimed to investigate whether the Thai Cardiovascular Risk (TCVR) score can be used to predict mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in Thai adults with metabolic risks. The study was conducted using secondary data of patients with metabolic risks from Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital. MCI was indicated by an MoCA score of less than 25. Six different TCVR models were used with various combinations of ten different variables for predicting the risk of MCI. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AuROC) and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit tests were used for determining discriminative performance and model calibration. The sensitivity of the discriminative performance was further evaluated by stratifying by age and gender. From a total of 421 participants, 348 participants had MCI. All six TCVR models showed a similar AuROC, varying between 0.58 and 0.61. The anthropometric-based model showed the best risk prediction performance in the older age group (AuROC 0.69). The laboratory-based model provided the highest discriminative performance for the younger age group (AuROC 0.60). There is potential for the development of an MCI risk model based on values from routine cardiovascular risk assessments among patients with metabolic risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buawangpong et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Metabolic risk factors and mild cognitive impairment (n=421). Thai Cardiovascular Risk (TCVR) score models was evaluated on Discriminative performance (AuROC) for predicting mild cognitive impairment (AuROC 0.61, 95% CI 0.53-0.68). The Thai Cardiovascular Risk score models demonstrated relatively poor discriminative performance for predicting mild cognitive impairment in adults with metabolic risk factors, with AuROC values ranging from 0.58 to 0.61.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: