Key result
SGLT2i linked to ~84% lower risk of composite renal outcomes vs DPP4i in diabetic kidney disease.
Why the study?
Cardiorenal outcomes had not been compared between DPP-4is and SGLT-2is in a national diabetic kidney disease population.
Do SGLT-2 inhibitors improve cardiorenal outcomes compared to DPP-4 inhibitors in adults with diabetic kidney disease and reduced eGFR?
Cohort (n=7,529)
Yes
Do SGLT-2 inhibitors improve cardiorenal outcomes compared to DPP-4 inhibitors in adults with diabetic kidney disease and reduced eGFR?
Hazard Ratio: 0.16 (95% CI 0.12–0.24)
SGLT-2 inhibitors demonstrate superior cardiorenal protective benefits compared to DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with diabetic kidney disease.
Supports renal benefit of SGLT-2i versus DPP-4i in DKD; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Aim To compare cardiorenal outcomes of dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors (DPP‐4is) and sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors (SGLT‐2is) in a national diabetic kidney disease (DKD) population. Methods A cohort study was conducted using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database and Laboratory Databases. Propensity score‐matched prevalent new users of SGLT‐2is ( n = 1524) and DPP‐4is ( n = 6005) during 2017‐2018 were selected from adults with DKD and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 60 mL/min/1.73m 2 . Composite renal outcomes included sustained eGFR decrease, renal failure and renal mortality. Composite cardiovascular (CV) outcomes included acute myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure and CV death. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Compared with DPP‐4i users, SGLT‐2i users had a reduced risk of composite renal endpoint (HR: 0.16; CI: 0.12‐0.24), consistently for a prolonged time to 50% or higher eGFR decrease (HR 0.17; CI: 0.11‐0.27), renal failure (HR: 0.14; CI: 0.08‐0.23) and decreased renal death (HR: 0.10; CI: 0.01‐0.70). SGLT‐2i users had a better composite CV outcome than DPP‐4i users (HR: 0.74; CI: 0.64‐0.85), and lower risks of stroke (HR: 0.76; CI: 0.62‐0.92) and hospitalization for heart failure (HR: 0.68; CI: 0.55‐0.84). Findings were consistent in analyses stratified by concomitant antidiabetic agents or intervals between DKD diagnosis and study drug initiation. Conclusions This study shows the superior cardiorenal benefits of SGLT‐2is compared with DPP‐4is in the DKD population, regardless of concomitant antidiabetic agents or time from DKD onset to study drug initiation. SGLT‐2is should be prioritized in adult patients with DKD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Diabetic kidney disease (n=7,529). Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) vs. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) was evaluated on Composite renal outcomes (sustained eGFR decrease, renal failure and renal mortality) (HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.12-0.24). SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with a reduced risk of composite renal outcomes compared with DPP-4 inhibitors in adults with diabetic kidney disease (HR 0.16; 95% CI 0.12-0.24).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: