Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This essay reflects on a transdisciplinary course to enhance public deliberation on wicked problems like COVID-19, indicating its educational value.
Some crises, such as those brought on or exposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, are wicked problems—large, complex problems with no immediate answer. As such, they make rich centerpieces for learning with respect to public deliberation and issue-based dialogue. This essay reflects on an experimental, transdisciplinary health and science communication course entitled Comprehending COVID-19. The course represents a collaborative effort among 14 faculty representing 10 different academic departments to create a resource for teaching students how to deliberate the pandemic, despite its attending, oversaturated, fake-news-infused, infodemic. We offer transdisciplinary deliberation as a pedagogical framework to expand communication repertoires in ways useful for sifting through the messiness of an infodemic while also developing key deliberation skills for productively engaging participatory decision-making with concern to wicked problems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coleman et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: