In many cases several mobile robots (autonomous agents) can be used together to accomplish tasks that would be either more difficult or impossible for a robot acting alone. Many different models have been suggested for the makeup of such collections of robots. In this paper the authors present a taxonomy of the different ways in which such a collection of autonomous robotic agents can be structured. It is shown that certain swarms provide little or no advantage over having a single robot, while other swarms can obtain better than linear speedup over a single robot. There exist both trivial and non-trivial problems for which a swarm of robots can succeed where a single robot will fail. Swarms are more than just networks of independent processors - they are potentially reconfigurable networks of communicating agents capable of coordinated sensing and interaction with the environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dudek et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: