Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Let \ X(t,ω ), - ∞ < t < ∞ \ be a real jointly measurable stochastic process and θ (ω ) a real random variable. We define \[ Y(t,ω ) = X(t + θ (ω ),ω )\]. If θ is independent of X, then for any times \ tⱼ ,j = 1, ⋯ ,n\ and every Borel measurable g(Y₁ , ⋯ ,Yₙ ) with E\ | g[Y(t₁ ), ⋯ ,Y(tₙ )] |\ < ∞, we find \[ ({i}) E\{ | {g[ Y( t_1 ) , ⋯ ,Y( t_n ) ]} | θ (ω ) = θ _0 \} = E\{ g[ X( t_1 + θ _0 ) , ⋯ ,X( t_n + θ _0 ) ] \} \] for almost every θ ₀ relative to μ, the measure induced on the real line by θ (ω ). When θ is independent of X and uniformly distributed over $[0,h]$, then Y is strictly stationary if and only if X is periodically nonstationary in the sense that its joint distributions are invariant under translations of length h. If θ is independent of a periodically nonstationary X and μ is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure, then Y is strictly stationary if and only if μ satisfies Beutler’s trigonometric moment condition. There are corresponding results in the wide sense case. If X is uniformly continuous in quadratic mean but not necessarily jointly measurable and θ is independent of $X(s)$ and $X(t)$ for every pair s, t, then X(t + θ (ω ),ω ) is given as a quadratic mean limit of X(t + θ ₙ (ω ),ω ), where the θ ₙ (ω ) are simple functions converging pointwise to θ (ω ). In this case, (i) holds at least for the first two moments of Y, that is, ${gathered} ({ii}) E\{ Y(t)| {θ (ω ) = θ _0 } \} = E\{ X(t + θ _0 )\} {a.e..}\,(μ ), \\ E\{ Y(s)Y(t)| {θ (ω ) = } θ _0 \} = E\{ X(s + θ _0 )X(t + θ _0 )\} {a.e.}\,(μ ). \\ {gathered} $ If (ii) holds for $θ $ uniformly distributed over $[0,h]$, Y is wide sense stationary if and only if X is periodically correlated in the sense that its first two moments are invariant under time translations of length h.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harry L. Hurd (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: