Key result
The two-level optimization strategy reconstructed brachial arterial pressure waves with significantly lower root mean square error than a generalized transfer function (3.61 vs 6.80 mmHg; p<0.01).
Why the study?
The authors sought to reconstruct continuous brachial arterial pressure waves from finger arterial pressure waves measured by the vascular unloading technique without arm-cuff calibration.
Does a two-level optimization strategy improve the accuracy of brachial arterial pressure reconstruction from finger arterial pressure compared to a generalized transfer function in volunteers?
Does a two-level optimization strategy improve the accuracy of brachial arterial pressure reconstruction from finger arterial pressure compared to a generalized transfer function in volunteers?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A novel two-level optimization strategy provides a semi-individualized transfer function that reconstructs brachial arterial pressure waves from finger arterial pressure significantly better than a generalized transfer function.
Objective: We attempt to reconstruct brachial arterial pressure (BAP) waves from finger arterial pressure waves measured using the vascular unloading technique without arm-cuff calibration. A novel method called twolevel optimization (TOP) strategy is proposed as follows. Methods: We first derive a simplified transfer function (TF) based on a tube-load model with only two parameters to be estimated, a coefficient B and a time delay Δt. Then, at level one, two minimization problems are formulated to estimate the optimal coefficient Bopt and time delay Δt opt . Then, we can derive an optimal TF h opt (t). However, this derivation requires true (or reference) BAP waves. Therefore, at level two, we apply multiple linear regression (MLR) to further model the relationship between the derived optimal parameters and subjects' physiologic parameters. Hence, eventually, one can estimate coefficient B MLR and time delay Δt MLR from subject's physiologic parameters to derive the MLR-based TF h MLR (t) for the BAP reconstruction. Results: Twenty-one volunteers were recruited for the data collection. The mean ± standard deviation of the root mean square errors between the reference BAP waves and the BAP waves reconstructed by hopt(t), h MLR (t), and a generalized transfer function (GTF) were 3.46 ± 1.42 mmHg, 3.61 ± 2.28 mmHg, and 6.80 ± 3.73 mmHg (significantly larger with p <; 0.01), respectively. Conclusions: The proposed method can be considered as a semi-individualized TF which reconstructs significantly better BAP waves than a GTF. Significance: The proposed TOP strategy can potentially be useful in more general reconstruction of proximal BP waves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2020) studied this question. Two-level optimization (TOP) strategy vs. Generalized transfer function (GTF) was evaluated on Root mean square error between reference and reconstructed brachial arterial pressure waves (p=<0.01). The two-level optimization strategy reconstructed brachial arterial pressure waves with significantly lower root mean square error than a generalized transfer function (3.61 vs 6.80 mmHg; p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: