Key result
Seventh-Day Adventist lifestyle was not associated with significant differences in mean blood pressure levels compared to non-SDA children across all ages.
Why the study?
Does Seventh-Day Adventist lifestyle affect blood pressure levels in children compared to non-SDA lifestyle?
Cross-Sectional (n=7,840)
Yes
Does Seventh-Day Adventist lifestyle affect blood pressure levels in children compared to non-SDA lifestyle?
Despite marked differences in adult mortality from hypertension-related diseases, SDA and non-SDA children show no significant differences in mean blood pressure levels.
Distribution of systolic and diastolic blood pressures (measured with an automated blood pressure recorder) of two large groups of children-3,159 from Seventh-Day Adventist (SDA) schools and 4,681 from non-SDA schools-are reported. They boys and girls were from four different ethnic groups and attended grades one through 10 in 29 Southern California schools. The analysis of the data failed to show significant differences in mean blood pressure levels between the two groups of children at all ages, despite marked differences in life-style between the two groups, and despite the fact that adults from the two population groups have marked differences in mortality from diseases associated with elevated blood pressure. A comparison between boys and girls showed significantly higher trends in mean systolic blood pressure for boys after age 12. Inter-ethnic comparisons of blood pressure revealed that Black children of both sexes had slightly higher mean blood pressure levels at all ages.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harris et al. (1981) conducted a cross-sectional in Blood pressure (n=7,840). Seventh-Day Adventist (SDA) lifestyle vs. Non-SDA lifestyle was evaluated on Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels. Seventh-Day Adventist lifestyle was not associated with significant differences in mean blood pressure levels compared to non-SDA children across all ages.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: