The paper focuses on a classical problem of ethics and law: the doctrine of double effect (DDE). Nowadays the doctrine is more and more popular since AI-technology and superintelligent machines have been developing rapidly. Maybe autonomous vehicles' most difficult dilemma is the following scenario: an autonomous car gets into an extreme road accident (collision) and the software should "decide" which direction-alternative to choose, but all of those possibilities end with death of human(s). This is a problem which requires a morally and legally justified answer. The principle emphasizes how to achieve a moral justification, what can be the classical cases of DDE and how to solve the most famous classical case, the trolley problem -which can be analogous to autonomous cars' collisioncase. The paper also higlights whether the doctrine is relevant from the perspective of legal justification and legal solutions, too.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lea Pődör (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: