PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1998Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise321 citationsOpen Access

Energy absorption of impacts during running at various stride lengths

View Full Paper
TDTimothy R. DerrickJHJoseph HamillGCGraham E. Caldwell

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how energy absorption changes during running at different stride lengths.
  • Constant running speed of 3.83 m/s across five stride lengths: preferred and variations (+/- 10% and +/- 20%)
  • Accelerometers attached to the leg and head of ten male runners to gather data
  • A rigid body model estimated net energy absorbed at hip, knee, and ankle joints.
  • Increased shock attenuation with longer stride lengths
  • More energy absorbed during impact with increasing stride length
  • Knee joint muscles showed the greatest adjustment in energy absorption response.

Abstract

PURPOSE: The foot-ground impact experienced during running produces a shock wave that is transmitted through the human skeletal system. This shock wave is attenuated by deformation of the ground/shoe as well as deformation of biological tissues in the body. The goal of this study was to investigate the locus of energy absorption during the impact phase of the running cycle. METHODS: Running speed (3.83 m x s-1) was kept constant across five stride length conditions: preferred stride length (PSL), +10% of PSL, -10% of PSL, +20% of PSL, and -20% of PSL. Transfer functions were generated from accelerometers attached to the leg and head of ten male runners. A rigid body model was used to estimate the net energy absorbed at the hip, knee, and ankle joints. RESULTS: There was an increasing degree of shock attenuation as stride length increased. The energy absorbed during the impact portion of the running cycle also increased with stride length. Muscles that cross the knee joint showed the greatest adjustment in response to increased shock. CONCLUSION: It was postulated that the increased perpendicular distance from the line of action of the resultant ground reaction force to the knee joint center played a role in this increased energy absorption.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Derrick et al. (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a221a2d9e220ae9ef494ed6https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199801000-00018
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper