Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Furthering the field’s attention to the rhetoric of archives, this article offers an extended consideration of archival description as an information infrastructure that provides powerful, although often invisible, orientations to the past. This article examines three stages of the archival process—selection, organization, and labeling—by focusing on a handful of historical objects, held in two separate collections, that depict transgressive gender presentations. Taken together, these examples demonstrate that archival description functions not only for bureaucratic and access purposes, but for epistemological ones as well.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
K.J. Rawson (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: