When hypervolume is used as part of the selection or archiving process in a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm, the basic requirement is to choose a subset of the solutions in a non-dominated front such that the hypervolume of the subset is maximised. We describe and evaluate two algorithms to approximate this process: a greedy algorithm that assesses and eliminates solutions individually, and a local search algorithm that assesses entire subsets. We present empirical data which suggests that a hybrid approach is needed to get the best tradeoff between good results and computational cost.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bradstreet et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: