Answering why-not questions on reverse top- k queries

Why-not questions, which aim to seek clarifications on the missing tuples for query results, have recently received considerable attention from the database community. In this paper, we systematically explore why-not questions on reverse top-k queries , owing to its importance in multi-criteria decision making. Given an initial reverse top- k query and a missing/why-not weighting vector set W m that is absent from the query result, why-not questions on reverse top- k queries explain why W m does not appear in the query result and provide suggestions on how to refine the initial query with minimum penalty to include W m in the refined query result. We first formalize why-not questions on reverse top- k queries and reveal their semantics, and then propose a unified framework called WQRTQ to answer why-not questions on both monochromatic and bichromatic reverse top- k queries. Our framework offers three solutions, namely, (i) modifying a query point q , (ii) modifying a why-not weighting vector set W m and a parameter k , and (iii) modifying q , W m , and k simultaneously, to cater for different application scenarios. Extensive experimental evaluation using both real and synthetic data sets verifies the effectiveness and efficiency of the presented algorithms.